Flo Rida’s Baby Mama Drama Ends W/ DNA Test Results

Miami rapper Flo Rida should start saving up his dollars these days as new reports claim he is the father of a video vixen's son.

According to reports, Flo’s baby mama drama came to a definitive end following a paternity test.

We broke the story … a hot model named Natasha Georgette Williams sued Flo last year for child support. However she wanted “good fortune” support … a special kind done for rich people’s kids. Flo admitted they had been banging all over the country — but he was convinced she was sleeping with multiple partners. He also allegedly offered to pay for an abortion. According to legal docs obtained by TMZ … Williams finally had the DNA test done and it shows a 99.99999999% chance Flo fathered the child. (TMZ)

Flo Rida’s baby mama is an extreme hottie in this must-see pic…

The vixen’s legal team has since issued a statement on the test results.

Williams’ lawyer Ray Rafool tells us, “Though not a surprise to Ms. Williams, we are certainly pleased that the Court ordered paternity test firmly establishes Flo Rida is the father of their son.” A judge hasn’t officially named Flo as the father yet, but we get a good feeling … that’s just a matter of time. (TMZ)

Flo recently saved $400,000 after a plaintiff decided to file a lawsuit via mega social network Facebook.

Flo Rida has dodged paying roughly US$400,000 in damages to the organizers of an Australian music festival he failed to show up to. The artist, whose real name is Tramar Dillard, was a no-show at the Fat As Butter fest in 2011, for which he’d apparently been paid his performance fee up-front. Promoters of the show, Mothership Music, sued Dillard and his management, VIP Entertainment and Concepts, in the NSW District Court for breach of contract and damages totalling Australian $417,345 ($377,000). With their options to serve papers limited, at best, the organizers’ legal team took the unusual step of filing a summons via Facebook — on the order of Judge Judith Gibson. (Billboard)

The plaintiff’s determination to serve Flo via Facebook was deemed an unsuitable approach.

After an initial ruling in the festival’s favor, the artist challenged the decision in the NSW Court of Appeal. And on Tuesday, the appeal was upheld. The judges declared that Facebook wasn’t an appropriate channel to serve, because there was no evidence that the artist was indeed connected to the social networking page. “The evidence did not establish, other than by mere assertion, that the Facebook page was in fact that of Flo Rida and did not prove that a posting on it was likely to come to his attention in a timely fashion,” Justice Robert McFarlan said in his reasons for judgment. (Billboard)