Vixen Blac Chyna and reality television star Kylie Jenner have reportedly gone after each other with a must-see social media battle.
Jenner appeared to go at Chyna with an alleged social media response to a picture she posted a few days ago.
https://instagram.com/p/0oP_3NxvpX/
It all started on Tuesday night when the 26-year-old model posted a picture of her glitzy watch â one nearly identical, if not entirely so, to the one Tyga gave her back in 2013. While the post may have seemed innocuous to some, Jenner, 17, appeared to respond to it with a selfie of herself wearing a similarly glam timepiece hours later, with the caption, “Currently.” (Page Six)
Check out the topless pics Blac Chyna responded with on the next page…
Chyna heated things up with some topless pics on her IG page.
https://instagram.com/p/0pKOyexvjJ/
https://instagram.com/p/0pLBtnxvj0/
https://instagram.com/p/0pMIdERvkm/
https://instagram.com/p/0pNaXdxvli/
Jenner seemed to respond back with a social media post.
https://instagram.com/p/0rcf_FRvtc/
Chyna’s ex-boyfriend Tyga posted up a solo shot of Jenner and dished out his love for her on Instagram earlier this month.
https://instagram.com/p/0LqpNNqeq8/?taken-by=kinggoldchains
A few weeks ago, Tyga dished on his personal feelings for the celebrity teen.
“I do it for myself. I speak what I feel in my heart. If I want to express that, I’m going to express that at the time. If I wanna express it later in life, I’ma do it later. I just feel like it’s nobody’s business. … If I love her and I love her as a person, ain’t nobody else gotta deal with that. The more your friendship grows, it keeps growing. It’s all about a friendship. And that’s what it is, you know?” (Hot 97)
Banging body but Chyna face look faker than Lil Wayne’s blood gang initiation
Evolutionary psychologists like to
say that our modern skulls house a
Stone Age mind.We employ concepts
from Darwinism to modern
evolutionary biology to explain
how human behaviours get derailed
by media, technology and dense
populations. However, my favourite
concept from animal research â Nobel
Laureate Niko Tinbergenâs supernormal
stimulus â hasnât received much
attention in psychology. This concept
has enormous potential to explain
current human woes.
Tinbergen coined the term when he
was making dummy objects to test
triggers of animal instincts. He found
that songbirds would abandon their
pale blue eggs dappled with grey to
hop on black polka-dot Day-Glo blue
dummies so large that they constantly
slid off and had to climb back on. Once
a chick hatched, parents preferred
feeding a fake baby bird beak on a
stick if the dummy beak was wider
and redder than the real chickâs.
Hatchlings begged a fake beak for
food if it had more dramatic markings
than their parentsâ.
Supernormal stimuli could be
produced for all major areas of animal
behaviour. Instincts werenât coded for
a complex shape of what to nurture or
mate with or attack. Animals
responded to just a few simple
characteristics that could easily be
exaggerated. Territorial male
stickleback fish ignored a real male to
fight a dummy with an underside
brighter red than that of any natural
fish. Male butterflies ignored a
receptive female to straddle small
cardboard cylinders if their vibrations
and stripes were more intense â the
cylinders didnât even need wings.
These animal behaviours look funny
to us⊠or sad. But just how different
are they from our modern habits?
People sit alone in front of a plastic
box streaming Friends instead of
going out with their real buddies.
They tend Farmville crops while
shirking their real duties. Men have
sex with two-dimensional screen
images when a willing partner maybe
in the next room. Research finds the
cutest babies â those with the largest
eyes and smallest noses â get the most
attention, but Hello Kitty beats any
babyâs proportions.
Fast-food chains serve up meals
concentrating sugar, salt and fat
because these were scarce nutrients
in the Paleolithic era that formed our
tastes. We donât crave green leafy
fibre equally â it was everywhere. Our
instincts about exercise basically tell
us, âRest when you donât need to be
exerting yourself.â Any instincts
towards more exciting aspects of
exercise are now supernormally met
by spectator sports. Stimuli for
threats donât need to be pleasant, they
just need to get our attention.
Whether itâs media reports about
terrorists or a film trailer with a
12-metre lizard heading our way, we
want to learn more.
Supernormal stimuli are a driving
force in many of todayâs problems,
including obesity, addiction to
television and video games, and war.
The key is that supernormal stimuli
reverse the natural relationship
between instinct and object. âTrust
your instinctsâ works only if weâre out
hunting and gathering, not when
weâre bumbling around shopping
centres. Becoming aware of
supernormal stimuli does more than
alert us to how these unfettered
instincts fuel dangerous excesses.
Once we recognise how supernormal
stimuli operate, we can craft new
approaches to modern predicaments.
Humans have one stupendous
advantage over Tinbergenâs birds â a
huge brain with an especially well developed
pre-frontal cortex.